CHIRAUDDIN MIYAN ALIAS CHIRAUDDIN MIAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8471/2024 · 2025-01-10
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25460 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25460 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8471 of 2024 Chirauddin Miyan @ Chirauddin Mian @ Jirauddin Miyan aged about 42 years, son of Late Bhutka Miyan @ Late Sultan Miyan, resident of Village Naiyadih, P.O. Madhupur, P.S. Budhai, District Deoghar … … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
----- For the Petitioner: M/s. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the State : M/s. Azeemuddin, A.P.P For the Informant: M/s. Aparna Dubey, Advocate --- 04/10.01.2025 Heard the Parties. Petitioner has been made an accused in connection with Budhai P.S. Case No. 16 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307 & 452/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur. On 15.02.2024 at about 06:30 A.M., the petitioner alongwith the co-accused persons due to land dispute assaulted the informant and his family members due to which several persons sustained injuries. It is specifically alleged that the petitioner had given sword blow on the person of the informant due to which he sustained injury on his head. Learned lawyer for the petitioner has submitted that the informant had sustained injury on his head which is opined to have been caused by hard and blunt substance. Learned lawyer for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there is a specific allegation against the petitioner of having assaulted the informant on the vital part of his body. It was further submitted that the informant had
sustained grievous injury. The petitioner is alleged to have given a single sword blow on the person of the informant. It further appears that the injuries sustained by the informant has been opined to be caused by hard and blunt substance.
Regard being had to the facts and circumstance of the case, the petitioner named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur in connection with Budhai P.S. Case No. 16 of 2024.
(Ambuj Nath, J.) Saurabh uploaded