Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25460 (HP)

Vijay Kumar v. Advik (minor) and another.

CRMPM/2561/2024 · 2025-03-21

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Vijay Kumar vs. Advik and another Cr.M.P(M) No.2561 of 2024 21.03.2025 Present: Mr. Anand Sharma, Advocate for the applicant (through video conferencing). Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the respondents. Cr.M.P(M) No. 2561 of 2024 For the reasons stated in the application, more particularly, in para 4 thereof, we find sufficient cause having been carved out, which prevented the applicant from filing the accompanying appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 72 days that has crept up in filing the petition. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Rev.(FC) No. of 2025 & Cr.M.PST No.11740/24 Be registered. Before the petitioner is heard in the matter, let him deposit the entire arrears of maintenance in the Registry of this Court within a period of four weeks from today. List the matter, after the petitioner deposits the amount in the Registry of this Court. ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Judge March 21, 2025 ( Sushil Kukreja ) (naveen) Judge