( 2025:JHHC:29401 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 5642 of 2025 Sahil @ Motasim @ Siddique @ Motasim Age 17 years, son of Ehsanullah, resident of Taj Nagar, Kapali, P.O. Kapali, P.S. Chandil, Saraikella, District-Saraikella-Kharsawan ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :M/s Nazia Rashid & Manjula Upadhyay, Advocates For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, A.P.P. 02/ 23.09.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No. 44 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 115(2), 351 (2)/351(3)/117(2)/118(1), 118(2), 109/49/352/61(2)/ 3 (5) of B.N.S, 2023, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there is general and omnibus allegation so far petitioner is concerned and the allegation of assault is there against Aayan and one another person who was present in the Saloon. She further submits that only allegation against the petitioner is that he was present there. She further submits that now compromise has reached between the parties and a joint compromise petition has been filed before the learned Sessions Judge however the learned Sessions Judge has not considered the same. On these grounds, she submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposes the prayer and submits that injury is grievous in nature. 5. Looking into contents of F.I.R, it transpires that there is direct ( 2025:JHHC:29401 ) allegation against Aayan and one another person who was present in the Saloon. So far petitioner is concerned, allegation is made that he was present there. Now compromise has reached between the parties and a joint compromise petition has been filed before the learned Sessions Judge contained in Annexure-2. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty-five thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Ranchi, in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No. 44 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Dt.23.09.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-