DWIPEN CHOUDHURY AND 3 ORS v. SURESH RAJBONGSHI AND 3 ORS
RSA/1/2025 · 2025-11-10
Parthivjyoti Saikia
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25456 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25456 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010000172025
2025:GAU-AS:15233
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/1/2025 DWIPEN CHOUDHURY AND 3 ORS SO LATE PRABODH CHOUDHURY RO VILL KARARA PO KARARA PS BAIHATA DISTRICT KAMRUP (R), ASSAM, PIN 781121 2: SRI PRAFULLA CHOUDHURY SO LATE PRABODH CHOUDHURY RO VILL KARARA PO KARARA PS BAIHATA DISTRICT KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN 781121 3: SRI DILIP CHOUDHURY SO LATE PRABODH CHOUDHURY RO VILL KARARA PO KARARA PS BAIHATA DISTRICT KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN 781121 4: SRI SUBUDH CHOUDHURY SO LATE PRABODH CHOUDHURY RO VILL KARARA PO KARARA PS BAIHATA DISTRICT KAMRUP (R) ASSAM PIN 78112 VERSUS SURESH RAJBONGSHI AND 3 ORS S/O SRI NAGENDRA RAJBONGSHI, RO VILL KARARA PS KARARA DISTRICT KAMRUP (R), ASSAM, PIN 781121 2:SRI PURNANANDA CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE NAGENDRA CHOUDHURY R/O- TEZPUR NEAR DARRANG COLLEGE
Page No.# 2/2 DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784001.
3:SRI GHANASHYAM CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE NAGENDRA CHOUDHURY R/O- TEZPUR NEAR DARRANG COLLEGE DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 784001.
4:SMTI. SAROJINI CHOUDHURY D/O- LATE NAGENDRA CHOUDHURY R/O- TEZPUR NEAR DARRANG COLLEGE DIST.- SONITPUR ASSAM PIN- 78400 Advocate for the Petitioner : , Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R SARMA, MR A HUSSAIN,MR D HAZARIKA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 11.11.2025
1. None appears for the appellants on call.
2. Heard Mr. R. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent No.1.
3. Here in this case, learned counsel representing the appellants had withdrawn the Vakalatnama. Therefore, Registry had issued a notice to the appellants, the notice was served and in spite of that none appears for the Vakalatnama.
4. This Court is of the opinion that keeping this Appeal pending would not serve any purpose.
5. Therefore, this Regular Second Appeal stands closed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant