AVDHESH KUMAR GUPTA SON OF LATE SHRI KISHAN LAL GUPTA v. SHRI KRISHNA KUNAL
CCP/763/2025 · 2025-08-14
Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25453 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25453 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31753-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 763/2025 Avdhesh Kumar Gupta Son Of Late Shri Kishan Lal Gupta, Aged About 76 Years, Resident Of E-445, Shastri Nagar, Ajmer (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Shri Krishna Kunal, Principal Secretary, Education Depart- ment, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat-Jaipur- 302005 (Raj.).
2. Shri Sita Ram Jat, Director, Secondary Educaiton, Ra- jasthan, Bikaner (Raj.)
3. Shri Ramson Victor, Chairman, Rajasthan Christian Cen- tral Management Board Of Secondary Education (R.c.c.m.b.s.e) (Bishop Diocese Of Rajasthan Church Of North India ) 2/x Cni Social Centre Opposite Roadways Bus Stand Ajmer.
4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Educa- tion Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Iliyas Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 14/08/2025
1. The present contempt petition is wholly misconceived.
2. We notice that the petitioner had filed an application titled as Avdhesh Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan before the Rajasthan Non Government Educational Institutions Tribunal (RNGEIT), Jaipur. However, the same was dismissed in default on account of non prosecution of petitioner himself.
[2025:RJ-JP:31753-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-763/2025]
3. He has moved a restoration application which is pending in light of the fact that there is no decision given by any Court of law with respect to the entitlement of claim of the petitioner to the demands as held in State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. The Management Committee Sh. Bhagwan Das Todi case.
4. No case for contempt is made out. The present contempt petition is wholly misconceived and the same is accordingly, dismissed.
5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J MAHIMA/RAHUL/13