APHC010360032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18465/2025 Between: 1. PEDDIREDDY SURYA PRAKASH REDDY, S/O VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY AGED 46 YEARS, HINDU. R/O D.NO. 7338/5/5, 0PP. INDANE GAS COMPANY, MANGAMUR DONKA, ONGOLE CITY, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-523001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE, ANDHRA PRADESH-523001. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER RDO, ONGOLE DIVISION,PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-523001. 4. TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, SANTHANUTHALAPADU, SANTHANUTHALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 523272. 5. NEELAM NAGENDRA, S/O PAPAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, HINDU, R/O NEELAMPALEM, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. VEMURI MALYADRI, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 SRS,J W.P.No.18465 of 2025 YEARS, HINDU, LAND BROKER, R/O 0PP. VIJAYA RAGHAVA RAO HOSPITAL, 60 FEET ROAD, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents No.2 to 4, in acting at the behest of Respondents No.5 and 6, in unlawfully interfering with the petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the landed admeasuring Ac. 1.04 cents in Survey No. 148/2 of Pernamitta Revenue Village, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, and trying to dispossession the petitioner from subject property without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct Respondents No.2 to 4 not to interfere in any manner with the petitioners possession and enjoyment in relation to the subject property, nor to insist upon dispossession of petitioner the same without due process of law, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of the landed property admeasuring Ac. 1.04 cents in Survey No. 148/2 of Pernamitta Revenue Village, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, nor to insist upon the petitioner vacating the same, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BODAPATI VAMSI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE SRS,J W.P.No.18465 of 2025 The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The grievance of the petitioner is that respondents 2 to 4 are interfering with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of the property of an extent of Ac.1.04 cents in Sy.No.148/2 of Pernamitta Revenue Village, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, without issuing any notice. 2. Heard Sri V. Saketh Roy, learned counsel representing Sri B. Vamsi Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G. Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appeared for respondents 1 to 4. Notice of respondents 5 & 6 is dispensed with since no adverse orders are passed against the rights and interests of respondents 5 & 6. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of an extent of Ac.1.04 cents in Sy.No.148/2 of Pernamitta Revenue Village, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, by General Power of Attorney dated 22.04.2021 executed by one Sri Kadapa Kameswari and others. At the behest of respondents 5 & 6, respondents 2 to 4 are trying to dispossess the petitioner. 4. Sri G. Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that respondents 2 to 4 are not interfering with the aforementioned property. The same is recorded. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of both the learned counsel, directing the respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere with an extent of Ac.1.04 cents in Sy.No.148/2 of Pernamitta SRS,J W.P.No.18465 of 2025 Revenue Village, Santhanuthalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, without following due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 22.07.2025 TVN SRS,J W.P.No.18465 of 2025 190 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.18465 OF 2025 Date : 22.07.2025 TVN