MUKUND MAHTO ALIAS MUKUND LAL MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8642/2025 · 2025-09-25
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25451 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25451 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:29998
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8642 of 2025
MUKUND MAHTO @ MUKUND LAL MAHTO, Aged about 50 years, Son of Doman Mahto, Resident of Village- Bodiya Basti, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Thermal, District- Bokaro.
.… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
..... Opposite Party
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Attanu Banerjee, Advocate
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, APP
--------- 02/Dated: 25.09.2025
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 414/34 of the IPC and Sections 30(ii) of the Coal Mines Act.
3.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is languishing in jail since 28.06.2025. He further submits that the allegation whatsoever has been levelled against the petitioner is concocted and baseless and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He lastly submits that the petitioner was not arrested at the spot.
4.
Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
5. Having regard to the facts of the case and the allegation made, the Petitioner is enlarged on bail by furnishing bail bond of ₹ 20,000/- each (INR Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Hazaribagh in connection with Barhi (Padma) P.S. Case No.29 of 2024.
6. It is made clear that during trial the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial. Further the petitioner will submit photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and mobile number before the court below which he will always keep active and will not change and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to take appropriate action.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) September 25, 2025
Fahim/