TINKU ALIAS BRAHMADEV RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./44/2025 · 2025-01-14
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2545 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2545 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.44 of 2025
------ Tinku @ Brahmadev Ram, aged about 34 years, son of Ram Pyare Ram, Resident of B.N.R. 8 Khapda Dhowra Bhagabandh, P.O.- Bhaga, P.S.-Putki (Bhagabandh OP), District-Dhanbad.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. Ruby Pandey, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No.02 Dated- 14/01/2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail in connection with Putki (Bhagabandh O.P.) P.S. Case No.62 of 2024 registered under section 414 of the Indian Penal Code, and under Section 4/21 of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957.
The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in loading and transportation of illegally extracted coal. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner is neither owner nor driver of the truck which was seized by the police in connection with transportation of coal. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 17 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this
order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 40,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Dhanbad, in connection with Putki (Bhagabandh O.P.) P.S. Case No.62 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/