APHC010360502025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18411/2025 Between: 1. BOYINA VENKATA PITCHAIAH,, S/O.SYAMALA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O.D.NO.2- 125,VANUDURRU, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - HOME, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAIKALUR, ELURU DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MUDINEPALLIPOLICE STATION, MUDINEPALLI, ELURU DISTRICT. 5. POLAGANI NAGA RANGA RAO, S/O.CHENCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O.VADALI VILLAGE, MUDINEPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B V ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the 5th respondent in not acting upon the complaint dated 03.06.2025 regarding illegal possession of cheque leaves 40 and 4 promissory notes by the 5th respondent as illegal and arbitrary and violation of Articles 19, 21 and 300 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to take necessary action against the 5th respondent for illegal possession of 2 the cheques promissory notes of the petitioner by considering the complaint dated 03.06.2025” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the unofficial respondent has illegally kept 50 cheques belonging to the petitioner. A complaint has been lodged with the police for registration of a case against the unofficial respondent, but there has been no response from the police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police have called both parties to the police station, and it came to light that the dispute between them is civil in nature. The police have advised both parties to approach appropriate court for taking further action in this matter. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.08.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18411 of 2025 Dt.04.08.2025 Asr