- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20023 MFA No. 5560 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5560 OF 2017 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT PREMA W/O LATE LOKESHA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS 2. MAHADEVAPPA S/O LATE SIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 3. SMT. SUVARNAMMA W/O MAHADEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 4. NAVEENA S/O MAHADEVAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT HONNEGOWDANAHALLI VILLAGE, HANGALAL HOBLI, DEVARAHALLI POST, GUNDLUPET TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT 571111. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VEERABHADRA SWAMY H P, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. K D SURESH S/O DARSHAN AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT KOOATALA HOUSE, POPE NAGAR, MANNUTHY POST, Digitally signed by BHARATHI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20023 MFA No. 5560 of 2017 THRISUR, KERALA STATE. 2. LAVIN PAULOSE AGE: MAJOR, KOCHERIL HOUSE, PARAPLLIYIL ROAD, ERANAKULAM, KERALA STATE. 3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., MANIKANAM PARAMBIL BUILDING, LAYAM ROAD, STATUE JUNCTION, ERANAKULAM, KERALA STATE MYSORE BRANCH AT #442/3/4, 2ND FLOOR, 100FT ROAD, CHAMARAJA DOUBAL ROAD, NEAR RAMASWAMY CIRCLE MYSORE 24. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B A RAMAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R3 NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH V/O DTD 14.11.2017) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.12.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.97/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND MACT AT CHAMARAJANAGAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for the appellants in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20023 MFA No. 5560 of 2017 2. The appeal was filed on 11.07.2017 and this Court on 14.11.2017 ordered for issuance of notice to respondent No.1. Till date, the requisite process fee for issuance of notice to respondent No.1 has not been paid. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the above appeal. Even today there is no submission on behalf of the appellants. Hence, the above appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE BS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34