Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25441 (KAR)

SMT.SUDHA v. SRI.RAMAKRISHNAPPA

RSA/946/2021 · 2025-06-18

H P Sandesh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20892 RSA No. 946 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.946 OF 2021 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUDHA, W/O.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. 2. KUM. SUSHMA, D/O.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. 3. KUM. JAYALAKSHMI @ SOWMYA, D/O.RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT MELUR VILLAGE, JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDLAGHATA TALUK-562101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MURTHY K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA, S/O PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 2. SRI. M.V. GOVINDAPPA, S/O. CHIKKA VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20892 RSA No. 946 of 2021 RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT MELUR VILLAGE, JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDLAGHATA TALUK-562101. 3. SRI. MURALI MOHAN, S/O BACHE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT GODLU MUDDENAHALLI VILLAGE, VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562110. 4. SRI. H.M. KRISHNAPPA, S/O.MUNISHAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT UTTANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK. PRESENTLY R/AT KANTHAHALLI VILLAGE, NANDI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562101. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.02.2021 PASSES IN R.A.NO.183/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDLAGHATTA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREED DATED 21.12.2013 PASSED IN O.S.NO.57/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SIDLAGHATTA. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20892 RSA No. 946 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the dispute between the parties has been settled outside the Court. 2. In view of the memo, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7