MAHMUD ALAM ALIAS MAHMOOD ALAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6225/2024 · 2025-06-11
Sri Ananda Sen
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25441 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25441 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:15127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6225 of 2024
1. Mahmud Alam @ Mahmood Alam son of Gulab @ Md. Gulam
2. Md. Sufiyan @ Sufiyan Alam son of Mahmud Alam @ Mahmmad Mehmud Alam
3. Pravej @ Md. Parwej, son of late Wahid @ Mohmmad Wahid.
4. Fasal @ Md. Faishal Alam, son of late Wahid @ Mohmmad Wahid
5. Md. Abdul @ Md. Abdulla Salfi son of Md. Naim.
6. Md. Sonu @ Abdul Rahim, son of Manowar @ Md. Manuwar. All are residents of village Hosir, Kasai Mohalla, P.O Hosir, P.S. Gomia, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand.
...... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party(s).
------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, A.P.P. …..... 07/11.06.2025:
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, if the petitioners surrender, their case will be considered strictly in compliance of the guidelines laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 as well as the observation made in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another reported in (2024) 9 SCC 198.
Anu/-C.P.-3
(ANANDA SEN, J.)