SMTI MINATI MANDAL v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.
MC/13/2025 · 2025-12-09
Kalyan Rai Surana, Shamima Jahan
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25441 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25441 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010076022025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : MC/13/2025 SMTI MINATI MANDAL W/O- SRI GAURANGA MANDAL, R/O- WARD NO-10, BIHPURIA TOWN, P.S.
BIHPURIA, P.O. BIHPURIA, DIST- LAKHIMPUR, PIN- 784161, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE HOME SECRETARY, GOVT OF INDIA 2:THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REP. BY CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER NEW DELHI- 110001 3:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-6 4:THE STATE COORDINATOR NATIONAL REGISTER OF CITIZENSHIP (NRC) ASSAM BHANGAGARH GHY-5 5:THE DY. COMMISSIONER DIST- LAKHIMPUR PIN- 784161 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (B) DIST- LAKHIMPUR PIN- 784161
Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 7:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE P.S. BIHPURIA DIST- LAKHIMPUR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N SARKAR, MR P. K. BASU Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM,SC, F.T,SC, ELECTION COMMISSION.,SC, NRC
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 10-12-2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. N. Sarkar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. A. Verma, learned standing counsel for the Foreigners Tribunal, Ms. S. Katakey, learned standing counsel for the Election Commission of India, Mr. M.R. Adhikari, learned CGC and Mr. P. Sarma, learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate.
2. By filing this IA, the applicant has prayed for restoration of WP(C) 3994/2019, which was dismissed for non-prosecution by order dated
31.05.2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although his name appeared in the cause list, but he missed the matter and therefore, default has occurred.
3. Although the learned standing counsel for the FT matters has opposed the prayer but considering the explanation rendered, the prayer made in this application stands allowed.
Page No.# 3/3
4. The order dated 31.05.2023, thereby dismissing WP(C) 3994/2019 for non-prosecution is recalled and the proceedings of WP(C) 3994/2019 is restored to file.
5. The Registry shall now list the said WP(C) 3994/2019 for passing appropriate orders.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant