[2025:RJ-JP:7157] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 129/2025 Manoj Kumar @ Vinod Kumar S/o Ramkishor, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Khohari, Police Station Mitrapura, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.). (At Present District Jail, District Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashindra Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 18/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.202/2024 registered at Police Station Mitrapura, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 318(3) & 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short ‘BNS’), 2023 (corresponding to sections 418 and 420 of IPC) and Sections 66B & 66D of Information Technology Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that there is allegation against the petitioner that he induced innocent people by way of advertising on social media the [2025:RJ-JP:7157] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-129/2025] ways to increase subscribers on YouTube and Instagram. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Manoj Kumar @ Vinod Kumar S/o Ramkishor shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:7157] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-129/2025] 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in every three months in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /103