2025:JHHC:13855 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.6293 of 2024 ------ 1.Sunil Maryia @ Sunil Lohra, son of Lafar Marya @ Skikandar Lohra 2.Ram @ Ram Hansda, son of Sanjhla Hasda 3.Ram Prasad Turi @ Karan Turi, son of Haricharan Turi All resident of Bhawani Chouki, PO Boria, PS Borio (J), District Sahibganj, Jharkhand … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party(s) With A.B.A. No.6386 of 2024 ------ 1.Bablu @ Chara @ Bablu Kisku, son of Manglu Kisku 2.Sanju Maryia @ Sanjay Mustri, son of Chuttra Mistri 3.Raju @ Raju Lohar, son of Bablal Lohar All resident of Bhawani Chouki, PO Boria, PS Borio (J), District Sahibganj, Jharkhand … … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Shekhar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. S. K. Tiwari, A.P.P. Mr. A. K. Tiwari, APP ----- 05/ 08.05.2025 Heard the parties. 2. These anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, have been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 386, 387, 353 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Sahibganj (M) PS Case No. 12 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM), Sahibganj. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 2025:JHHC:13855 2 4. It is an allegation that these petitioners were collecting money by way of extortion from the truck drivers who are transporting stones. Further it has been alleged that when the police officials tried to forbade these petitioners and others there was scuffle and altercation amongst them. 5. Considering the nature of the allegation and involvement of the petitioners wherein they have obstructed the police officials from performing their duties and also extorting money from the truck drivers, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, these Anticipatory Bail Applications stand dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3