Bora Ramachandra Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal
WP/12342/2016 · 2025-09-22
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25438 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25438 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010360842016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12342/2016 Between:
1. BORA RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/O. TATA RAO AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, BUSINESS,
R/O. D.NO.38-40-43, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
2. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE VISAKHAPATNAM, -
4. BORA DURGA REDDY, S/O. APPANNA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 38-40-1, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner has passed away and efforts to bring the legal representatives on record have not yielded any result. It is further submitted that the learned counsel who had entrusted this matter to the petitioner is also no more and that no further instructions.
2. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 23.09.2025 SR