DEEPAK DHINGRA ALIAS DEEPAK v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/3948/2025 · 2025-04-08
Harsh Bunger
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25435 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25435 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Priyanka 2025.04.15 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-3948-2025 2 and 3/M.C., respectively.
4.
Learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3/M.C., while referring to order dated 19.07.2023 (Annexure P-8) submits that the petitioner had dug up basement in contravention of the approved site plan and as a result of which, a loss has been caused to the adjoining properties. It is submitted that Municipal Corporation has already sought report from the Civil Engineer, Department of Guru Nanak Devi University, as regards the firmness of the soil which is stated to have been re-filled in the dug up basement and also as regards any loss caused to the adjoining properties. It is further submitted that upon receipt of such report and/or any other report as may be submitted by the petitioner, the authorities would reconsider the case of the petitioner by passing a speaking order, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in respect of sanctioning of the site plan and necessary action would be taken within a period of six weeks from today.
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3/M.C., the present writ petition is
disposed of, accordingly.
6. All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 08.04.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Pd
JUDGE
1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
2. Whether reportable : Yes/No Priyanka 2025.04.15 14:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document