Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2543 (HP)

MEHRU DEVI v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CMP/30936/2025 · 2026-01-08

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Mehru Devi v. State of Himachal Pradesh and aother CMP No. 30936 of 2025 in Execution Petition No. 1972 of 2025 8.1.2026 Present: Mr. Lalit Kumar Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent- State. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. While placing on record, communication dated 6.1.2026, issued under the signatures of Executive Engineer, Jal Shakti Division Anni, enclosing therein copy of order dated 12.12.2025, passed by Chief Engineer, Mandi Zone, Jal Shakti Vibhag, Mandi, which is taken on record, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General states that mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands complied with. Having perused aforesaid communication, assertion of learned Additional Advocate General appears to be correct. Services of the petitioner have been converted from Part Timer to Daily Wager on completion of ten years, in supersession of office order dated 31.3.2008, with effect from 1.1.2005. In view of the aforesaid, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant application and same is disposed of, with a direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from afore orders are released in favour of the petitioner, within two weeks from today. In the meantime, petitioner may also furnish documents, as are required, to the Department, enabling it to process the case of the petitioner. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge January 8, 2026 (Vikrant)