[2025:RJ-JP:36411] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9373/2025 Rajkumar @ Raju Katiyar S/o Babulal Katiyar, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village Ranisar Bas, M.s. College Ke Pass, Reserve Police Line Ke Pichhe, Police Station Sadar, District Bikaner At Present Gali No. 05, Rampura Basti, Bikaner (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Tiwari Mr. Bhuwnesh Kumar Sharma Ms. Tanisha Jain For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Rajkumar @ Raju Katiyar S/o Babulal Katiyar seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.314/2025 dated 18.05.2025 registered at P.S. Karnivihar, District – Jaipur (West), for the offence under Sections 303(2), 317(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not [2025:RJ-JP:36411] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9373/2025] have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the report is registered against an unknown person but later present petitioner accused was falsely implicated by police. He further submitted that out of seven cases registered against the present petitioner three were already decided and present petitioner is in custody since 01.07.2025. At last, he submitted that the police has already filed a charge-sheet. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. She has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. After theft of a Scorpio vehicle of complainant Anil Kumar in the night of 18.05.2025 a report is registered on very same day and police has investigated the matter. During investigation police has found involvement of Yogesh Kumar, Harpreet @ Aman @ Gagan and Raj Kumar @ Raju. The vehicle is not recovered by police, but police has already filed a charge-sheet against three persons. There are nine criminal cases against the petitioner accused out of which two are under investigation and petitioner accused is in custody in both the matters. Present case is not included in the list of nine cases shown against the petitioner accused. [2025:RJ-JP:36411] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9373/2025] The petitioner accused is continuously indulged in commission of theft. 7. The facts and the material indicate that the alleged offence are of serious nature and role attributed to applicant is prima facie sufficient to consider complicity of applicant in the crime. Therefore, at this juncture, considering the evidence collected so far, this is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant accused on bail. 8. Considering the gravity of allegations and overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to dismiss the bail application of the applicant accused at this stage. 9. Accordingly, the application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS preferred by Rajkumar @ Raju Katiyar S/o Babulal Katiyar, is hereby dismissed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /130