Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010277802025 2025:GAU-AS:17751 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/4143/2025 HITESWAR SARMAH S/O-LATE JYOTISH CHANDRA SHARMA, RESIDENT OF SARUPATHAR TOWN, DISTRICT -GOLAGHAT, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM , REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION SECONDARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:THE SECRETARY SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT KAAC DIPHU. 3. THE ADDL. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KARBI-ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU. 3:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS KARBI-ANGLONG DISTRICT CIRCLE DIPHU. 4:SRI KALYAN CHETIA RETD.PRINCIPAL RESIDENT OF SHANKARDEV NAGAR HOUSE NO.-272 TARAJAN JORHAT BYE LANE-6 PIN CODE-785001. DISTRICT-JORHAT ASSAM. 5:SRI PHANIDHAR DEKA Page No.# 2/4 SUBJECT TEACHER BOKAJAN H.S. SCHOOL BOOKAJAN KARBI ANGLONG Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S B PRASAD, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU., SC, K A A C Linked Case : WP(C)/6272/2024 HITESWAR SARMAH S/O.- LATE JYOTISH CHANDRA SARMAH PERMANENT RESIDENT OF SARUPATHAR TOWN DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE SECRETARY SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT KAAC DIPHU. 3:THE ADDL. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU KARBI ANGLONG. 4:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS KARBI ANGLONG DISTRICT CIRCLE DIPHU. 5:KALYAN CHETIA (RETD. PRINCIPAL) BOKAJAN HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL BOKAJAN Page No.# 3/4 KARBI ANGLONG. 6:PHANIDHAR DEKA SUBJECT TEACHER BOKAJAN H.S. SCHOOL BOKAJAN KARBI ANGLONG. ------------ Advocate for : MR. S B PRASAD Advocate for : SC SEC. EDU. appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 19.12.2025 Heard Mr. M. K. Sarma, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. R. Barua, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party No. 1. Also heard Mr. H. S. Borah, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 6. This interlocutory application is preferred by the applicant for allowing him to take steps for service of notice upon the opposite party No. 5 at his residential address or alternatively, to allow the petitioner to substitute the address of the opposite party/respondent No. 5. in the writ petition. Ms. R. Barua, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party No. 1 and Mr. H. S. Borah, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 6, submits that they have no objection in the event of allowing this application. Accordingly, taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties, this interlocutory application stands allowed. The applicant is allowed to take steps upon the respondent No. 5 in his residential address. In view of the order passed in this interlocutory application, the petitioner shall Page No.# 4/4 file an amended cause title in WP(C) No. 6272/2024, within a period of one week from today. In terms of the above, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant