Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2542 (ALL)

RAVINDRA v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/41030/2025 · 2026-04-01

Harvir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41030 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. 2. By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 474 of 2024, under Sections 126(2), 109, 352 and 351(3) of B.N.S., P.S. Rath, District-Hamirpur, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to some ulterior motive. He next submitted that the victim, Sanjay, had a habit of consuming alcohol and was inebriated state on the day of the alleged incident and he had an altercation with some pedestrians who were waiting for a vehicle, following which some unidentified assailants attacked the alleged victim, causing injuries to him. He further submitted that no incriminating article or material has been recovered either from the applicant of on his pointing out. He lastly submitted that the applicant, who is in jail since 25.10.2024 and has no criminal antecedents to his discredit is entitled to be enlarged on bail during pendency of the trial. 4. On the other hand, the learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that in the F.I.R. itself it is alleged that the applicant-accused has assaulted the victim/injured person with a broken bottle, as a result of which the alleged victim sustained grievous injuries, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Tarun Jha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravindra .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) wherein the Doctor Hari Narayan Rajpoot has given a statement that the injuries caused to the injured Sanjay are dangerous to life (Annexure-8) and in view of the above, the applicant-accused is not entitled to be released on bail. 5. After having heard the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail during the trial, hence this bail application is rejected. April 2, 2026 Faridul BAIL No. 41030 of 2025 2 (Harvir Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad