IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 1274 of 2024 Date of Decision: 26.03.2025 Rajnish Kumar ... petitioner Versus State of H.P and ors. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Paras Sharma, Advocate. For respondent No.1 : Mr. Tarun Pathak, Deputy Advocate General. For respondent No.2 : Mr .Sunit Dutt Gautam, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (oral) After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 26th March, 2025 (saurav pathania) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.