Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25406 (AP)

KORUMILLI BALA PRASAD v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/19232/2025 · 2025-07-28

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010359582025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 19232/2025 Between: 1. KORUMILLI BALA PRASAD, S/O. K. SATYANARAYANA, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 1-1A-23/1 MAHATMA STREET, 80 FEET ROAD, KONDAYYAPALEM, KAKINADA URBAN, EAST GODAVARI DT. A.P-533003. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. DY DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, KAKINADA X66W PLUS CRH, 2ND ST, AYODHYA NAGAR, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 533003. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTOR OFFICE, RAMA RAO PETA, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH- 533001. 4. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, X65G PLUS 8C9, KAKINADA RD, KACHIRIPETA, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 533001. 5. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, X63J PLUS HCQ, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533001 6. KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH-533001. 7. ROAD TRANSPORT OFFICER, ROAD TRANSPORT OFFICE, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH-533003. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus by directing the respondent Nos. 3, 4, 6 and 7 to consider the Representation s dt. 30.06.2025 to remove the un- authorized Sand Stock Point running by very few influenced private people in survey No. 199 belongs to the government in the heart of the Kakinada city by blocking the National High Way without any permissions to maintain sand stock point by transporting the sand with heavy vehicles with the support of high-handed influence by disturbing peace and harmony of the public, which is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent Nos. 3, 4, 6, and 7 to stay all further activities of sand dumping and transporting from the unauthorized sand stock point in Survey No. 199 in Kakinada City on the government land illegally and without any permissions, pending disposal of the above main writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MEDAPATI RAMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file Public Interest Litigation (PIL). Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioner to file Public Interest Litigation (PIL). The Registry is directed to return the original pendrive to the learned counsel for the petitioner. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 29.07.2025 TVN 76 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.19232 OF 2023 Date : 29.07.2025 TVN