HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37760 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State, and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 10.07.2025 passed by the Commissioner, Aligarh Division, Aligarh- respondent no.2 in Case No. 962 of 2024, titled Veena Gupta v. Vice Chairman, Aligarh Development Authority, under Section 28A(4) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, as well as the order dated 22.08.2024 passed by the Presiding Officer, Aligarh Development Authority, Aligarh in Case No. A.L.D.A./A.N.I./2024/0001455 of 2024-25 under Section 28A(1) of the said Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition at this stage and seeks liberty to avail the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 41(3) of the aforesaid Act, if so advised. April 23, 2026 Anil K. Sharma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajit Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vibhanshu Vaibhav (Vinod Diwakar,J.) Veena Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad