CRL OP No. 6069 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP No. 6069 of 2025 Devendran S/o Perumal, No.72/C, Seramarathur, Kovilur, Athipattu, Tiruvannamalai District. Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Forest Range Officer, Jamunamarathur Forest Office, Tiruvannamalai District. (STOR No. 01 Of 2025 Respondent(s) CRL OP No. 6069 of 2025 PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in event of his arrest at the hands of the respondent police concerned in STOR No.1 of 2025 on such terms and conditions and as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper and thus render Justice. CRL OP No. 6069 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr. R. Parthiban For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Santhosh, Govt. Advocate https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6069 of 2025 ORDER The case of the prosecution is that, the petitioner along with other accused had involved in illegal transportation of 98 kilograms of sandal wood. Hence, the case. 2. This is the second anticipatory bail petition before this Court. The earlier anticipatory bail petition in Crl. O.P. No. 1341 of 2025 was dismissed on 29.01.2025 by Hon'ble Mr.Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira and this anticipatory bail petition is listed before this Court pursuant to the orders passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Crl. O.P. No. 31787 of 2024 on 04.03.2025. 3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that 181 sandal pieces was seized from A2 and the petitioner is A1. He had one previous case, similar in nature and there is no change in circumstances. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6069 of 2025 4. This Court while dismissing the first anticipatory bail petition passed the following orders: “6. Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and the nature of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.” 5. This Court is of the view that there is no change in circumstances and hence, is not inclined to entertain this second anticipatory bail petition. 6. Hence, the anticipatory bail petition is dismissed. 18-03-2025 AT https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6069 of 2025 CRL OP No. 6069 of 2025 To 1.The State Rep By, The Forest Range Officer, Jamunamarathur Forest Office, Tiruvannamalai District. (STOR No. 01 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 6069 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN, J. AT CRL OP No. 6069 of 2025 18-03-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis