KARAMJEET SINGH SIDHU ALIAS KARAMJIT SINGH SIDHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./8946/2025 · 2025-09-26
Rajesh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25397 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25397 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:30308
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8946 of 2025 ---- Karamjeet Singh Sidhu @ Karamjit Singh Sidhu, aged about 56 years, Son of Late Vichettar Singh, Resident of C.D.6, South Colony Chas Nala, PO & PS Patherdih, District-Dhanbad
…. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. …. Opposite Party ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Adv.
For the State
: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P.
----
02/Dated: 26th September, 2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
2. The applicant, who is in custody since 04.06.2025 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Bankmore P.S Case No.126 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 310(4), 310(5), 312, 317(5) of BNS and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 25(1-A), 26, 35 of the Arms Act and Section 25(6) of the Arms (Amendment) Act, 2019, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
4. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the applicant has falsely been implicated in this case and there is no eye witness to the occurrence rather only under a conspiracy the name of the petitioner is mentioned in the FIR. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
5.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the nature of crime, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the applicant is hereby, rejected at this stage.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
26th September, 2025 Raja/Uploaded