Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25390 (CHH)

Sanjay Babbar v. Kunjlal Dadsena

MAC/1382/2016 · 2025-06-19

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1382 of 2016 Sanjay Babbar S/o Shri Subhash Chanda Babbar, aged about 40 years R/o Plot No.07, B, Ashish Nagar, Rishali, Bhilai, Police Station Sector 06, Bhilai Nagar, Presetnly R/o M I G-167, Hudco, Bhilai, Police Station Sector-06, Bhilai Nagar, Tahsil And District: Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant Versus 1. Kunjlal Dadsena S/o Tiharan Lal Dadsena, Aged About 28 Years R/o Dumarpali, Police Station Basna, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 2. Sheikh Hamid S/o Sheikh Mohar, Aged About 27 Years R/o Basna, Police Station Basna, Tahsil And District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 3. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Registered And Head Office E-8, Ricco Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur Rajasthan 303022, Through Branch Manager Branch Office, Ama Naka, Mahoba Bazar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) __________________________________________________________________ For Appellant : Mr. Vidya Bhushan Soni, Advocate on behalf of Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate SAURABH YADAV Digitally signed by SAURABH YADAV Date: 2025.06.20 16:28:42 +0530 Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 20.06.2025 1. Heard I.A. No. 3 of 2020, an application for disposing the appeal as abated. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant has died on 17.05.2020 during the pendency of this appeal, a death certificate in this regard is also annexed herewith. Therefore, he prays that the appeal may be disposed of as abated. 3. In view of above, I.A. No. 3 of 2020 is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as abated. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE Saurabh