KAPIL CHANDRAKANT SHELKE S/O CHANDRAKANT SHELKE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/4474/2025 · 2025-08-11
Sudesh Bansal
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25388 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25388 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31043] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4474/2025 Kapil Chandrakant Shelke S/o Chandrakant Shelke, R/o Sagar Apartment, Flat No. 9, Gawade Colony, Chinchawad, Pune, Maharashtra- 411033. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor.
2. Sushrat Agarwal S/o Rajkumar Gupta, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 4B12, Talwandi, Keshavpura, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuj Jain for Mr. Vikram Pratap Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 11/08/2025
1. Instant criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS (erstwhile Section 482 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 310/2024 registered at Police Station Dadabadi, Kota for offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(2) of the BNSS.
2. Counsel for petitioner states that the dispute is virtually of civil nature and relating to business transaction, moreover, the parties have settled the dispute by way of mutual settlement. A copy of settlement agreement has been placed on record.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has placed on record the investigation report dated 07.08.2025. As per the investigation report, the Investigating Officer after thorough investigation states
[2025:RJ-JP:31043] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4474/2025] that the dispute in the impugned FIR is to be of civil nature and has produced the negative final report before the concerned Judicial Magistrate, which too has been accepted vide order dated
08.03.2025. The factual report is taken on record.
4. In view of above, since negative final report has been submitted as same has been accepted by the Judicial Magistrate, the prayer for quashing of FIR has become infructuous.
5. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
6. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /35