SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. BULBULI CHARAH TAYE @ BULBULI TAYE AND 3 ORS.
I.A.(Civil)/3902/2025 · 2025-12-02
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25388 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25388 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010260312025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3902/2025 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
1000 E/8, RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPURA, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN- 302022 AND HAVING A BRANCH OFFICE AT B.R. ARCADE, 3RD FLOOR, 21 JANAPATH, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI-781007. VERSUS BULBULI CHARAH TAYE @ BULBULI TAYE AND 3 ORS.
W/O LATE UMANANDA TAYE 2:DANITA TAYE D/O. LT. UMANANDA TAYE
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF- R/O-VILLAGE-REST CAMP P.O.LAIMEKURI AND P.S. JONAI DISTRICT-DHEMAJI ASSAM.PIN-787060. PRESENT ADDRESS- R/O-BONGAIGAON W/N-25 P.S. AND DISTRICT-BONGAIGAON.PIN-783380. CLAIMANTS 3:MEGHANATH BARMAN S/O BANESWAR BARMAN R/O-VILL-NO.3 BODALPUR P.O.RAMDHAN DIKHARI P.S. CHIMEN CHAPORI DISTRICT- DHEMAJI ASSAM. PIN-787060. OWNER OF THE VEHICLE NO.AS-22-C-8588 4:KAMALA CH KARDONG S/O TIRTHANATH KARDONG R/O.VILLAGE-MIRI TAKO P.O.LAIMEKURI DIST-DHEMAJI ASSAM. PINCODE-787060. DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE NO.AS-22-C-858
Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M SAIKIA, MS. P BORTHAKUR,MR. R GOSWAMI Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case :MAC App./11480/2025 (Filing Number) SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ULUBARI VERSUS BULBULI CHARAH TAYE ALIAS BULBULI TAYE AND ORS BONGAIGAON ------------ Advocate for : MONDAKINI SAIKIA Advocate for : appearing for BULBULI CHARAH TAYE ALIAS BULBULI TAYE AND ORS
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 03.12.2025 Heard Ms. P. Borthakur, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the applicant.
2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of 18 days of delay in filing the connected MAC Appeal.
3. This Court has gone through the application and found that the delay has been satisfactorily explained.
4. This Court is of the opinion that at this stage, going for issuing notice to the respondents would not serve any purpose.
5. Therefore, the delay stands condoned.
6. The connected MAC Appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The IA stands disposed of accordingly.
Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant