IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14692 of 2025 Decided on: 11th September, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amar Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice confined to respondents No.1 and 2, which is waived by Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General. In view of nature of order being passed hereinafter, neither notice of this petition is required to be issued to respondent No.3 nor reply is required to be called for from the appearing respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 3. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) seeking applicability of Amar Singh & others Versus State of H.P. & Another2, which, in turn, is stated to have been decided on the basis of Yashwant Singh and others Versus State of H.P. and another3, has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgments within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. 2 CWP No.2272 of 2024, decided on 02.04.2024 3 CWP No.342 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 31.08.2022 3 The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 11, 2025 Judge Mukesh