Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25386 (BOM)

SURESH TRAMBAK PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLN/3391/2024 · 2025-08-20

Shri Sushil M Ghodeswar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 52 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3391 OF 2024 SURESH TRAMBAK PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Mr. Bhushan Dhawale, Advocate h/f Mr. J.V. Patil, Advocate for applicant Mr. A.D. Wange, APP for respondent No.1 Mr. S.V. Dixit, Advocate (appointed) for respondent No.2 ... CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI & SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, JJ. DATE : 20th AUGUST, 2025 ORDER : . After showing disinclination to grant any relief in favour of applicant, learned Advocate for applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application. Hence, the application stands disposed of as withdrawn. 2 Fees of the appointed Advocate is quantified at Rs.8,000/- (Rupees Eight Thousand only), to be paid by High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Aurangabad. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) ( SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. ) agd 2025:BHC-AUG:22912-DB