SRI MOHAMMED AYAZ PASHA v. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
RP/227/2024 · 2025-07-04
C M Poonacha, S G Pandit
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25382 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25382 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24266-DB RP No. 227 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA REVIEW PETITION NO. 227 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
SRI MOHAMMED AYAZ PASHA S/O MOHAMMED MARDAN, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCCUPATION BUSINESS, R/AT NO.3 4TH CROSS AMBEDKAR LAYOUT TELECOM EXTENSION, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU 560040 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATACHALAPATHI S K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, PROJECT OFFICE CAVERY BHAVAN BENGALURU …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA A KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W
ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PRESENT REVIEW PETITION AND REVIEW THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN W.P. NO.13210/2023 (KLGP) VIDE AT ANNEXURE-A DATED 20.07.2023 AND SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER DATED 30.06.2022 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA LAND GRABBING PROHIBITION SPECIAL COURTS AT
Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24266-DB RP No. 227 of 2024
BENGALURU IN LGC(G) 361/2019 WITH RESPECT TO CIVIL LIABILITY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M.POONACHA)
Learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the respondent are present.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent has filed a memo placing on record that consequent to the order dated 30.6.2022 passed by the Special Court for Land Grabbing, on 7.2.2025 the unauthorized building was demolished and the possession was taken, which is also evidenced by a mahazar. The copies of the mahazar and photographs are produced along with the memo.
3. In view of the same, the above review petition as well as the interim application are dismissed as not surviving for consideration.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24266-DB RP No. 227 of 2024
4. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy as may be permissible under law.
Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE
ND List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4