Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25374 (BOM)

AHYALYABAI RAMRAO JAIBHAYE (DIED) THR. LRS. VIJAYKUMAR R. JAYBHAY AND ANR v. THE UNION OF INDIA, THR THE GENERAL MANAGER, C.R. MUMBAI AND ORS

CA/9784/2024 · 2025-08-12

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 959.CA-9784-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 959 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9784 OF 2024 IN FA/205/2024 AHYALYABAI RAMRAO JAIBHAYE (DIED) THR. LRS. VIJAYKUMAR R. JAYBHAY AND ANR VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA, THR THE GENERAL MANAGER, C.R. MUMBAI AND ORS ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr.R.G.Narwade h/f.Mr.Shekade Shashikant E AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.D.B.Bhange Advocate for Respondent No.1 and 2 :Mr.R.R.Bangar … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 12.08.2025 PER COURT : . The sole applicant/Ahilyabai Rambhau Jaybhay is passed away who is respondent in the first appeal. In fact such type of application should have been filed by the appellant who has preferred first appeal. 2. The cause of action survives against heirs of original claimant. There is no dispute about her death. Though prayer for condonation of delay has not been made, I accept the oral submissions of learned counsel in respect of delay. The heirs of the original claimant are coming before the Court for bringing them on record. 2025:BHC-AUG:21964 2 959.CA-9784-2024.odt 3. In that view of the matter, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘A’. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] vsj..