IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.264 of 2025 ------ 1. Jahangir Quraishi @ Md. Jahangir Quraishi, aged about 35 years, s/o Bashir, r/o-Niz Dankuni, Molla Para, Ward No. 4, Dankuni Coal Complex, Dankuni M, P.O & P.S- Dankuni, Hooghly- 712310 (West Bengal), currently residing in House No. 88, Garha Toli, Shanti Nagar, Kokar, P.O- Kokar & P.S Sadar, Ranchi- 834001 (Jharkhand) 2. Gulab Quraishi @ Sagir Kureshi, aged about 29 years, s/o Basir Kureshi, r/o 88, Near YMCA School, Garha Toli, Shanti Nagar, Kokar, P.O- Kokar & P.S- Sadar, Ranchi- 834001 (Jharkhand) 3. Shabir Kureshi @ Md. Shabir Kureshi, aged about 25 years, s/o Bashir Qureshi, r/o House No. 88, Garha Toli, Shanti Nagar, Kokar, P.O- Kokar & P.S- Sadar, Ranchi- 834001 (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Taufiq Qureshi, s/o Late Sarful Haq Qureshi, r/o Qureshi Mohalla, Near Raza Masjid, P.O & P.S.- Lower Bazar, Ranchi- 834001 (Jharkhand) .... .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Shubham Kataruka, Advocate Ms. Ushma Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Anish Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate ------ Order No.02 Dated-22-01-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Lower Bazar P.S. Case No.191 of 2024 instituted under Sections 316(2)/318(4)/61(2)/351(2)/(3)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners undertook to pay the money taken by their father Bashir Qureshi to the informant but went back from their promise and when the informant went to take the money, they threatened him of dire consequences. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that there is no allegation of entrustment of any money to the petitioners nor there is any allegation of dishonest misappropriation of the property entrusted to the petitioner. It is also submitted that Lower Bazar P.S. Case No.190 of 2024 was instituted by the father of the informant and thereafter as a counter-blast, this false case has been foisted against the petitioners. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class XXVIII, Ranchi in connection with Lower Bazar P.S. Case No.191 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/