1 2025:CGHC:22535 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4093 of 2025 1 - Kalyani Fekar W/o Dushyant Dheewar Aged About 32 Years Occupation - Assistant Teacher, Government Abhyas Primary School, Mahasamund District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Public Instruction Directorate, Chhattisgarh First Floor, C- Block Indravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Deputy Director Public Instruction Directorate Chhattisgarh, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Divisional Joint Director Education Division Mahasamund District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Mahasamund District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Mahasamund District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 7 - Secretary Rationalization Committee (District Education Officer) Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondents AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.06.06 11:54:40 +0530 2 (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. R.S. Marhas, Additional A.G. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 05/06/2025 1. This petition has been filed against the impugned transfer order dated 02/06/2025, by which, the petitioner herein transferred from Government Abhyas Primary School Mahasamund to Government Primary School, Fooljhar, Block Division Bagbahara. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned transfer order dated 02/06/2025 (Annexure P-1) is not in accordance with rationalization transfer policy, therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. He would also submit that the petitioner has filed representation before the competent authority for redressal of his grievance vide Annexure P-4, which has not been considered and decided yet. He further submits that the competent authority be directed to decide the petitioner’s representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 3. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, would submit that the representation filed by the petitioner will be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of seven days. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 3 5. In view of the above, the competent authority is directed to decide the petitioner’s representation, if not decided yet, in accordance with law by 10th June, 2025, till then, the impugned transfer order dated 02/06/2025 kept in abeyance. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Amardeep/Ankit