[2025:RJ-JP:32927] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9381/2025 Bablu Son Of Ramdayal, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Chhatripura (Jaitpur) Police Station Dihauli District Dholpur ( At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Jain For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Mohammad Shahid Hassan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.46/2025 registered at Police Station Diholi, District Dholpur for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) and 125 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023. Investigation is being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 118(1) and 109(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that cross cases have been registered between the parties wherein petitioner himself has sustained injuries. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:32927] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9381/2025] is behind the bars since 28.06.2025 and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him behind the bars. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that there is serious allegation against the petitioner of causing injury on the head of injured namely- Ramveer and same has been opined as dangerous to life by the medical expert. It is further submitted that investigation is going on. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by parties, especially considering the fact that injury caused on the head of the injured has been opined as dangerous to life and same has been attributed to the petitioner, as also the fact that investigation is still going on thus, looking to the nature and gravity of offence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /138