Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10416 WP No. 48070 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 48070 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SRI B G RAMAIAH S/O LATE GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS RESIDING AT KUDUR VILLAGE KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 561 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL S. RAO.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI MOHAMMAD LIYAKAT S/O LATE ABDUL JALEEL, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
2.
SRI ABDUL HAQ S/O ABDUL SATTAR AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 ARE RESIDING AT KUDUR VILLAGE KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 561 101.
3.
SRI MOHAMMAD AMEEN KHAN S/O MOHAMMAD JAFFAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT KUSHALANAGAR K G HALLI, BANGALORE - 560 045.
Digitally signed by ROOPA R U Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10416 WP No. 48070 of 2018
4.
SRI K KRISHNAMURTHY S/O KALEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 95, TUNGANAGAR MAIN ROAD, HEROHALLI, NEAR RAMAKRISHNA ASHRAM, BANGALORE - 560 091.
5.
SMT MUNEERA W/O LATE SYED JALEEL AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
6.
SMT RESHMA D/O LATE SYED JALEEL AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
7.
SRI NAFEEZ S/O LATE SYED JALEEL AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
8.
SRI ATHEEQ S/O LATE SYED JALEEL AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
9.
SRI WASEEQ S/O LATE SYED JALEEL AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
RESPONDENTS 5 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT S.S PALYA, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT - 561 101.
10. SRI K B BALARAJU S/O LATE K BADRAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT KUDUR VILLAGE, KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARAM, DISTRICT - 561 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUBBA SHASTRY N.,ADVOCATE FOR C/R4;
SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE FOR R5 TO R9
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10416 WP No. 48070 of 2018
R10 SERVED AND UN REPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OF THE ORDER DATED 19.07.2018 ONE PASSED BY THE III ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAMANAGARAM IN M.A.NO.7/2018 VIDE ANNX-H TO THE W.P. WHO CONFIRMED THE ORDER DATED 09.04.2018 ONE PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MAGADI ON I.A.NO.1 IN O.S.NO.200/2017 VIDE ANNX-F AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
ORAL ORDER
Petitioner is plaintiff in O.S.No.200/2017 which is filed by him for relief of declaration and consequential permanent injunction. An application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC filed by the plaintiff for an ad interim order of injunction has been rejected by the Trial Court against which the plaintiff had filed a miscellaneous appeal in M.A.No.7/2018 which also resulted in dismissal. Being aggrieved by these two orders, petitioner is before this Court.
2. This Court by order dated 07.01.2022 had directed the parties to maintain status quo with regard to possession as it existed.
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10416 WP No. 48070 of 2018
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well respondents that in the aforesaid suit in O.S.No.200/2017, trial having been completed and the matter is now set down for final arguments.
4. In that view of the matter no purpose would be served in keeping this matter pending. In the light of the interim order of status quo granted by this Court being is in force till date, taking note of submissions made by the counsel for the parties, petition is disposed of directing the parties to maintain status quo as directed by this Court by order dated 07.01.2022 until disposal of the suit in O.S.No.200/2017.
SD/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE
RU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29