2025:HHC:33172 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.14617 of 2025 Decided on: 22.09.2025 __________________________________________________________ Yogender Singh ...Petitioner Versus State Bank of India and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioners: Mr. Sushant Vir Singh, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1-Bank. Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General for respondents No. 2 to 4-State. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice[Oral] Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail the remedy in accordance with law, wherein challenge to the order passed by District Magistrate Shimla under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 has been raised. The observations made on 09.09.2025, read as under: 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:33172 - 2 - “Apparently, there is an outstanding amount of Rs.96,42,076/- as on 14.01.2025 which is clear from the order dated 11.07.2025, (Annexure P-2) passed by the District Magistrate, Shimla. 2. Counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to give any statement regarding the bonafides of the petitioner to deposit a reasonable amount to reduce his liability. 3. Apparently at-least, there are two cash credit facilities having been availed apart from housing loan as per details given in Paragraph 16 of the petition. 4. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner prays for time to have necessary instructions. 5. List the matter on 22nd September, 2025.” 2. In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 22nd September, 2025 [himani/Bhardwaj]