^ ^ APHC010357772025 ^ Mi IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTtCE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI WRIT PETITION NO: 18258 OF 7()9Fi X-i ltd.. iy. Y4/V 40/ PRATAPA Between: Raila Lokeswara Rao, S/o Raila Kamaraju, r lane, SAR CPL, VTC, Amberpet, Sub District Amberpef R/o Biock-1, Quarter No.5, Poiice , Hyderabad District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh. Represented Department of Home at Secretariat District by its Principal Secretary, Velagapudi. Amaravathi, Guntur 2. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam 3. The Circle Inspector of Police Srikakulam District. 4. The Sub-inspector of Poiice, Saravakota, Srikakulam District. 5. Simhadri Jhansi Srikakulam District. Saravakota, Saravakota Police Station Saravakota Police Station W/o Rajila Yadagiri, Aged Peddalamba Village, Saravakota Mandal, about 24 Srikakulam District years ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution circumstances stated i of India praying that in the in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue a writ, order or direction may be more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No. 3 and 4 iin calling the petitioner to Police Station frequently without there being any crime registered against petitioner and in interfering with the matrimonial disputes at the instance of 5th Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Art 14 of Constitution of India and to consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 not to interfere with the matrimonial between the petitioner and the 5th Respondent and also petitioner to Police Station without there being any crime registered against disputes not to call the him lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondent No. 3 & 4 not to interfere with the matrimonial disputed of petitioner by coercing and pressurizing him to settle the Matrimonial disputes with the 5th Respondent herein and not to call him to the Police Station, pending disposal of W P No. of 2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VARDHINEEDI SAI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 1 APHC010357772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18258/2025 Between; 1.RAILA LOKESWARA RAO,, S/0 RAILA KAMARAJU, R/0 BLOCK-1, QUARTER N0.5, POLICE LANE, SAR CPL, VTC, AMBERPET, SUB DISTRICT AMBERPET, HYDERABAD DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. DEPARTMENT OF HOME AT 3.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SARAVAKOTA SARAVAKOTA POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4.THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, SARAVAKOTA, SARAVAKOTA POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5.SIMHADRI JHANSI, W/0 RAJILA YADAGIRI, AGED ABOUT 24 PEDDALAMBA VILLAGE. SARAVAKOTA MANUAL, YEARS SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature 2 % of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No. 3 and 4 in calling the petitioner to Police Station frequently without there being any crime registered against petitioner and in interfering with the matrimonial disputes at the instance of 5^'^ Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Art. 14 of Constitution of India and to consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 not to interfere with the matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and the 5th Respondent and also not to call the petitioner to Police Station without there being any crime registered against him and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondent No. 3 & 4 not to interfere with the matrimonial disputed of petitioner by coercing and pressurizing him to settle the Matrimonial disputes with the 5th Respondent herein and not to call him to the Police Station, pending disposal of W P No. of 2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VARDHINEEDI SAl KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18258/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “...pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No. 3 and 4 in calling the petitioner to Police Station frequently without there being any crime registered against petitioner and in interfering with the matrimonial disputes at the instance of 5th Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Art. 14 of Constitution of India and to consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 not to interfere with the matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and the 5th Respondent and also not to call the petitioner to Police Station without there being any crime registered against him and to pass... ” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home upon written instructions would submit that since there is no crime registered against the petitioner, the Police never called the petitioner to the Police Station. Sri Vardhineedi Sai Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to follow the due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand 3. 4. closed. Sd/- N NAGANINIA assistant registrar SECTION OFFICER //true copy// To, at Secretariat, Department of Home 1. The Principal Secretary, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Saravakota, Saravakota Police Station, Srikakulam District. 4. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Saravakota, Saravakota Police Station, Srikakulam District. 5. One CC to SRI VARDHINEEDl SAI KIRAN Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 21/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 18258 OF 2025 ^ 2 0 AUG 2025 ntSecti o <o ★ DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS