Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25357 (AP)

S DEVI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/18385/2025 · 2025-07-20

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010358362025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18385/2025 Between: 1. S DEVI, D/O SURYANARAYANA, INDIAN, FEMALE, AGED ABOUT 38YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O HYDERABAD, PRESENTLY COMES DOWN TO AMARAVATHI. MOBILE 7993512443 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, , REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY , HOME DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE MRO, NIDADAVOLE MANDAL, NIDADAVOLE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, RAJAHMUNDRY 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SAMISRIGUDEM POLICE STATION EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. KOPPULA RAMBABU, S/O NOT KNOWN. MASON, 2- 129, SIVALAYAMSTREET, BJP COLONY, VIJJESWARAM VILLAGE, NIDADAVOLE MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AP ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased seeking order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare inaction of the respondents more particularly the 2nd 2 respondent in not taking any action that a complaint was made against respondent No. 5 and thereby threatening with the influence of the 3rd parties is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent authority not to threaten us when we go ingress and aggress in to our house bearing No.2-124, in S.No.48/IB, BJP Colony, Sivalayam Street, Vigneswaran Village, Nidadavole Mandal, East Godavari District and consequently direct the official respondents to take necessary enquiry in to the said notice/representation dt.5-5-25 in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice and consequently a positive direction may be issued to the respondent in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Please to direct the 2nd and 5th respondent authority not to interfere and evict from the D.No.2-124, BJP Colony, Sivalayam Street, Vijjeswaram Village, Nidadavole Mandal, East Godavari District without due process of law in the circumstances of the case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VINJAMURI RANGA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18385/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased seeking order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare inaction of the respondents more particularly the 2nd respondent in not taking any action that a complaint was made against respondent No. 5 and thereby threatening with the influence of the 3rd parties is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2nd respondent authority not to threaten us when we go ingress and aggress in to our house bearing No.2-124, in S.No.48/IB, BJP Colony, Sivalayam Street, Vigneswaran Village, Nidadavole Mandal, East Godavari District and consequently direct the official respondents to take necessary enquiry in to the said notice/representation dt.5-5-25 in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice and consequently a positive direction may be issued to the respondent in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard Sri Vinjamuri Ranga Babu, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, upon receipt of written instructions, would submit that the subject matter is of civil in nature. The Police cannot interfere in the matter. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter before appropriate forum. 4 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to pursue the matter before the appropriate forum. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 21.07.2025 UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18385 of 2025 Dated.21.07.2025 UPS 84