Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25355 (RAJ)

AMI CHAND SHARMA v. DIRECTOR NATIONAL CAPITAL ANR

CW/17644/2012 · 2025-05-06

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18962] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17644/2012 Ami Chand Sharma ----Petitioner Versus Director National Capital Anr ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4834/2009 Tilak Raj Sharma ----Petitioner Versus State Of Raj And Ors ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12763/2012 Mamraj Sharma ----Petitioner Versus State U I T And Ors ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14806/2012 Jairam Sharma ----Petitioner Versus State Urban Improvement Ors ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17726/2012 Brij Mohan Sharma ----Petitioner Versus Director National Capital Anr ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17727/2012 [2025:RJ-JP:18962] (2 of 2) [CW-17644/2012] Chotte Lal ----Petitioner Versus Director National Capital Anr ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17780/2012 Jogendra Sharma ----Petitioner Versus Director National Capital Anr ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17866/2012 Ram Babu Sharma ----Petitioner Versus Director National Capital Anr ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nisha Jhakhariya HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 06/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that these writ petitions have become infructuous. Accordingly, these civil writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /263-270