- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2725 RFA No. 1182 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1182 OF 2023 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SMT. SIDDAGANGAMMA W/O PRAKASH.M, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/A NO.48/71, 3RD CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 072. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VENUGOPAL.C.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT S.R.UMA KUMARI W/O MAHADEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/A NO.1305AB, 5TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN ROAD, PRAKASHNAGAR, BENGALURU-560 020. 2. SHOBHA S R W/O SATISH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/A NO.105, 10TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN, MUNESHWARA NAGAR, ULLAL MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 056. 3. SHASHIKALA S R W/O M PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/A 132, 6TH CROSS, HOSAHALLI MAIN ROAD, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2725 RFA No. 1182 of 2023 THUNGA NAGAR VISHVANEEDAM POST, BENGALURU-560 091. 4. SRI SRINIVASA GOWDA S/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/A NO.9, 1ST CROSS, NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-560 072. 5. SHOBHA.K W/O LATE GOPALAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/A NO.49, NEAR SOLLAPURADAMMA TEMPLE, SUNKADAKATTE, VISHWANEEDAM POST, BENGALURU-560 091. 6. SRI SIDDARAJU S/O GANGADHARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/A NO.225, PIPELINE ROAD, SRINIVASA NAGAR, SUNKDAKATTE, BENGALURU-560 091. 7. SRI MUNIRAJU N S/O LATE NARASIMHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/A NO.7, 6TH CROSS, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVASA.M.V., ADVOCATE FOR C/R7) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2725 RFA No. 1182 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Sri.Manjunath., counsel on behalf of Sri.Venugopal.C.N., for the appellant has appeared in person. Smt.Siddagangamma - the appellant is physically present before this Court and she has been duly identified by her counsel. Counsel for the appellant submits that a memo has been filed stating that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the appellant and the appellant submits that a conscious decision is taken by them to withdraw the appeal and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the appellant & the appellant and the memo is placed on record. The Regular First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5