[2025:RJ-JP:1426] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 354/2025 Premchand S/o Kajod, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Mahodari, PS Nahargarh, Dist. Baran (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Dist. Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Nagar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh Shekhawat & Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 09/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.150/2024 registered at Police Station Nahargarh (Baran), District Baran for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that allegation against the petitioner that he stabbed knife into abdomen of the injured but as per medical opinion, the said injury has been caused by blunt object. It has been further mentioned in the report that the said injury is grievous and could be dangerous to life. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2024. There is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has already been filed. Trial of the case may take considerable time and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:1426] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-354/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also the fact that as per medical opinion, the injury on the abdomen was caused by blunt weapon whereas allegation against the accused is stabbing with knife; the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents & looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Premchand S/o Kajod shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of this bail application and would not have any impact on the trial in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J Sunita/171