- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6232 RSA No. 96 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.96 OF 2022 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. GANGA BYRAPPA SINCE DEAD BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS SMT. MUTHAMMA W/O LATE GANGA BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 2. SMT. SHAKUNTHALA W/O NAGARAJA AND D/O GANGA BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 3. SRI. RENUKAPPA S/O LATE GANGA BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT HUNCHANAPALYA DASANAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SRINIVASA K.N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6232 RSA No. 96 of 2022 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN KANDAYA BHAVANA BENGALURU - 560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISON KANDAYA BHVANA BENGALURU - 560 009. 4. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK KANDAYA BHAVANA BENGALURU - 560 009. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.09.2019 PASSED IN R.A.NO.29/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.10.2015 PASSED IN O.S. No.154/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6232 RSA No. 96 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel for the appellants has remained absent. 2. Vide order dated 05.01.2024, this Court has imposed cost of Rs.1,000/- payable to the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority, failing which the appeal stands dismissed. In spite of lapse of one year, the appellants have not complied the office objections and also not paid the cost imposed by this Court. Therefore, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the appeal for default. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default. SD/- (K.NATARAJAN) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34