Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25348 (RAJ)

VISHNU PANCHAL SON OF SHRI HANUMAN PANCHAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/263/2025 · 2025-07-21

Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27182-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 263/2025 Vishnu Panchal Son Of Shri Hanuman Panchal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o 194/213, Pratap Nagar, Sector-19, Sanagner, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj. 2. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Traffic Unit Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionrate, Jaipur. 4. Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (South). 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur (South). 6. Gaurav Panchal Son Of Unknown, R/o Ghat Gate, Jaipur. 7. Sameer Sharma Son Of Unknown, R/o Jagatpura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 21/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time is not pressing this petition with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law. 2. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. [2025:RJ-JP:27182-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-263/2025] 3. There is no doubt in the eventuality of petitioner availing the remedies in accordance with law, the Forum concerned shall consider the same expeditiously. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Chandan/52