1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4275 of 2025 1 - Deepak Kumar Dadsena S/o Shri Motilal Dadsena Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Kodwamahant, Post - Dongariya, Tahsil - Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Block - 3, Second And Third Floor, Indravati Bhavan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - District Co-Operative Central Bank, Maryadit Bilaspur Through The Collector / Prescribe Officer, District Co-Operative Bank, Maryadit, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Nodal Officer District Co-Operative Central Bank, Maryadit Bilaspur Circle, Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Assistant Commissioner / Assistant Registrar Co-Operative Societies Mungeli, Collectorate Campus, Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Joint Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Bilaspur, In Front Of Collectorate, Old Composite Building, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 6 - The Branch Manager / Authorized Officer Adim Jati Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Dongariya, Registration No. 1333, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Keshav Dewangan, Advocate. For State : Shri Ajit Singh, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No.2&3: Ms. Seema Verma on behalf of Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 13.06. 202 5 1. The limited prayer made by the petitioner in this petition is for a direction to the respondent No.6 to decide his pending representation dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P/8) within a reasonable period. 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that vide order dated 22.11.2022 he was appointed as Computer Operator (Temporary) and was posted at Paddy Procurement Centre, Dongariya, District Mungeli, however till date he has not been permitted to join on the said post for which he filed his representation but till date the same has not been decided. Therefore, the respondent No.6 may be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously. 3. The submission made by the counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the opposite side. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, the respondent No.6 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P/8) on its own merits preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order asto costs. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder