Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25343 (RAJ)

RAM PRAKASH MATHUR v. ICICI BANK LTD AND ORS

CW/2460/2017 · 2025-01-28

Sudesh Bansal

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3893] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2460/2017 Ram Prakash Mathur, Son Of Roop Narayan Mathur, 23/109, Swarn Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Icici Bank Limited, Through Chanda Kochhar, Chief Executive Officer, Icici Bank Tower, South Tower, West Wing, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai Maharashtra. Through Zonal Manager, Metro Urban Icici Bank Limited, C-3, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, 302021 Raj. 2. Rakesh Bansal, Deputy General Manager, Icici Bank Limited Through Chief Officer, Hrmg,c-3, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur 302012 Raj. 3. Soumendra Mattagaja Singh, General Manager, Icici Bank Limited, Through Chief Manager, Hrmg,c-3, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur 302012 Raj. 4. Governer, Reserve Bank Of India Through The Regional Director, Rbi Rambagh Circle, Tonk Road, Jaipur Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lucky Sharma for Mr. Aditya Kiran Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Namish Nigotia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 28/01/2025 1. Instant writ petition was filed by petitioner-plaintiff, feeling aggrieved by denial to take rejoinder on record, however, it has been informed that during course of writ petition, the original suit itself has been decided on 10.07.2024. Hence, instant writ petition has rendered infructuous and petitioner does not want to press the same. 2. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as not press. 3. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/310