APHC010358042020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23803/2020 Between: 1. M.DEVIKA, WIFE OF LATE RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, RIO. H.NO. 19-E-210-E, HATHIRAMJI COLONY, TIRUPATHI TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , TIRUPATHI URBAN, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. MR SYED AZEEM, S/O. S.GHOUSE, AGED MAJOR, R/O. D.NO.20-2- 678, MARUTHINAGAR, KORLA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondnet in not taking any action in pursuance to the representation/complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 1210.2020 against the 3rd respondent atleast by causing enquiry on the same, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violationof Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondnet to 2 consider and take steps in pursuance to the aforesaid representaiton and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dated 11410.2020 by taking appropriate steps in pursuance thereof, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23803 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not taking any action in pursuance to the representation/complaint lodged by the petitioner dated 12.10.2020 against the 3rd respondent atleast by causing enquiry on the same, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to consider and take steps in pursuance to the aforesaid representation and to pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the police have not received any complaint dated 12.10.2020 as alleged by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of, by giving liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedies according to law. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.08.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 23803 of 2020 Dated.20.08.2025 UPS 153