SHAKEEL AHMAD AND ORS. v. FAROOQ AHMED FAKTOO,SECY.EDUCTN.AND ORS.
CPSW/362/2012 · 2025-09-16
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2534 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2534 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 19
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: CPSW 362/2012 in SWP 1321/2009
Shakeel Ahmad & Ors. …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, Advocate
V/s
Farooq Ahmed & Ors. ... Respondent(s) Through: None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 16.09.2025
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the conditions on which the petitioners case for the purpose of promotion were placed before DPC stands quashed by the Central Administrative Tribunal. His statement is taken on record and also with the efflux of time, instant petition has become infructuous. In view of the above, proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed as having been rendered infructuous. Contempt notices shall stand withdrawn. It is, however, made clear that in case any surviving cause of action exists, the petitioner may avail appropriate remedy as may be admissible under law.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE Jammu 16.09.2025 AKHILESH