Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2533 (UTT)

RAMAN LAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/77/2020 · 2025-06-09

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:4694 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 09.06.2025 CRLR No. 77 of 2020 Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. Mr. Arjun Arora, proxy counsel for Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. 3. Mr. Bharat Tewari, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. 4. Learned counsel for the revisionist would submit that the present revision has become infructuous. 5. In view of above, the present revision stands dismissed as infructuous. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 09.06.2025 Akash